Final June, simply months after the discharge of ChatGPT from OpenAI, a few New York Metropolis legal professionals infamously used the device to put in writing a really poor transient. The AI cited pretend circumstances, resulting in an uproar, an indignant choose and two very embarrassed attorneys. It was proof that whereas bots like ChatGPT might be useful, you actually must examine their work fastidiously, particularly in a authorized context.
The case didn’t escape the parents at LexisNexis, a authorized software program firm that provides tooling to assist legal professionals discover the correct case legislation to make their authorized arguments. The corporate sees the potential of AI in serving to cut back a lot of the mundane authorized work that each lawyer undertakes, however it additionally acknowledges these very actual points because it begins its generative AI journey.
Jeff Reihl, chief expertise officer at LexisNexis, understands the worth of AI. The truth is, his firm has been constructing the expertise into its platform for a while now. However with the ability to add ChatGPT-like performance to its authorized toolbox would assist legal professionals work extra effectively: serving to with transient writing and discovering citations quicker.
“We as a company have been working with AI applied sciences for plenty of years. I believe what is de facto, actually completely different now since ChatGPT got here out in November, is the chance to generate textual content and the conversational features that include this expertise,” Reihl instructed TechCrunch+.
